But when I tried going into the Dashboard / Site Admin, I got this error message:

Fatal error: Call to undefined function register_sidebar() in /home/ ... /wp-admin/includes/dashboard.php on line 12


Searching Google for “Call to undefined function register_sidebar()” turned up this discussion.

The solution that was proposed included disabling the Disable WordPress Widgets plugin, and that was directly applicable to my site as it was running on a 3-column variation of the K2 theme.

I took the following steps.

Step 1 - Edit an existing post

I was wondering how to get to the plugins page since I wasn’t able to call up Site Admin. By a stroke of luck, I thought of trying to edit an existing post, and it worked. I was then able to click on the Plugins link.

Step 2 - Deactivate the Disable Wordpress Widgets plugin

This a pretty straightforward step. Just scroll down the page until you see the Disable Wordpress Widgets plugin, then click on the Deactivate link.

Step 3 - Navigate to the Dashboard

Test that everything went well by clicking on the Dashboard link at the upper left-hand corner. You should be able to see the brand-new Wordpress 2.5 Dashboard now.

After this experience, I think I’ll stick to the Default Wordpress Theme and modify the design and functionality to suit my needs.

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Password:

Here are links to resources or individual photos which have assisted me in the ID process.

Flora

1. Trichomanes elegans, id by Izuan.
   

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Password:

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Password:

Payment can be via Paypal, cash deposit into Maybank or cash on delivery within Klang Valley.

Phone and email support is provided.

Kindly contact me after perusing this forum post for details.

Sincerely,
David Chin

Here’s a collection of links to Linux resources that I’ll be using for the Linux environment that’ll run on my Compaq Presario B3800 Notebook.

Color management

1. Linux applications that support the use of Adobe’s ICC profile.

Links compilation by other Linux users

1. Forum post by JimC - difference between Linux distro and Linux itself, site that tracks distros, SimplyMEPIS 6.5.02, PCLinuxOS, Sidux 2007-2.
   Image Editing tools: digiKam, Krita, Lightzone (free for Linux users), Pixel, Bibble for Linux, Google’s Picasa, Xara LX (recently renamed to Xara Extreme), UFRaw, RAW Therapee

Personally, I use both formats, JPEGs for snapshots (family members having fun), and RAW when the image is an important one (National Geographic -esque landscape in front of me, or a studio portrait).

Anyway, I found a gem (two actually) of an example showing the ease with which one can fix NEF files from Nikon digital SLR cameras in a forum thread debating (again) JPEG vs RAW.

Gerry submitted these - click on the thumbnails to read the forum post and view the before and after images.

First example

Second example

Much thanks for that, Gerry!

This post will forever be incomplete, and more information will be added in time.

Lighting is important

I always like some light to come from the windows or doorway from behind or the side of my daughters. This is a personal preference. I’ve tried with direct sunlight falling on their faces, but the photographs somehow aren’t to my tastes. So, I frequently incorporate a degree of rear or side-lighting.

To illuminate their faces, I either use whatever indoor lighting that’s bouncing around, or I use my Nikon SB-800 flash.

If I decide to go with ambient lighting, I’ll try to get a spot meter reading of their face, and throw in an EC of +0.3 or +0.7. Or I’ll just do a trial and error by taking a test shot with the camera in matrix metering plus some EC. With my D70, I invariably have to put the camera into +0.7 EC to avoid having the photo come out on the dark side.

If I use the SB-800 flash, I’ll put the diffusion dome on the flash head and point the head at the ceiling. I tend to always use bounced flash as much as possible.

The use of a minimum of two sources of lighting is important to me. Consider the two photos below (straight from the camera, only resizing and sharpening was done in Nikon Capture 4.4.2).

The first picture is of Renice with the use of only bounced flash. When the camera is in portrait mode (held vertically), bounced flash tends to create a shadow to the side. If the subject is close to the background, the shadow is more obvious, and ugly. I find this photo uninteresting from a lighting perspective.

Full EXIF:
Nikon D70
Focal Length: 50mm
Optimize Image: Normal
Color Mode: Mode Ia (sRGB)
Long Exposure NR: Off
2007/02/23 10:29:36.8
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Flash +3
Tone Comp.: Auto
Bounce
JPEG (8-bit) Fine
Metering Mode: Multi-Pattern
AF Mode: AF-S
Hue Adjustment: 0°
Image Size: Large (2000 x 3008)
1/60 sec - F/2.8
Flash Sync Mode: Front Curtain
Saturation: Normal
Exposure Comp.: 0 EV
Auto Flash Mode: Balanced i-TTL
Sharpening: Auto
Lens: Nikkor 50mm F/1.8 D
Sensitivity: ISO 400
Auto Flash Comp: 0 EV

The second is again of Renice, but this time, sunlight is streaming into the room from a window behind her. Notice the formation of “rim light” on her hair and left shoulder. This makes for a more interesting photo, from a lighting perspective. To illuminate her face, I used the SB-800 in TTL-BL mode (this Nikon technology attempts to balance the illumination from the flash with the ambient lighting to create a mild fill-flash effect). If you’ve read Thom Hogan’s Nikon field guides, you’ll know that he recommends that the EC on the flash be dialed down to -1.7 to ensure that the fill-flash effect looks even more natural (that is, as if there was no flash used at all) - I sometimes forget and leave it at zero - that’s OK because my wife prefers her children’s face to look bright in photos :-). Also, the background is relatively far away, so you don’t notice any shadows behind her. You’ll need to experiment a lot to develop a feel for when and under what circumstances the shadow appears - you can only get better with lots of practice.

Full EXIF:
Nikon D70
Focal Length: 50mm
Optimize Image: Normal
Color Mode: Mode Ia (sRGB)
Long Exposure NR: Off
2007/02/23 10:30:22.8
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Flash +3
Tone Comp.: Auto
Bounce
JPEG (8-bit) Fine
Metering Mode: Multi-Pattern
AF Mode: AF-S
Hue Adjustment: 0°
Image Size: Large (2000 x 3008)
1/60 sec - F/2.8
Flash Sync Mode: Front Curtain
Saturation: Normal
Exposure Comp.: 0 EV
Auto Flash Mode: Balanced i-TTL
Sharpening: Auto
Lens: Nikkor 50mm F/1.8 D
Sensitivity: ISO 400
Auto Flash Comp: 0 EV

Camera Settings

The image processing engine in the Nikon D70 produces somewhat less-than-satisfactory JPEG files in default settings. I’ll list some of my oft-used settings that represent an attempt to work around these issues.

White Balance

I’ll use Auto White Balance -2 or -3 most of the time. Automatic White Balance at zero tend to result in photos that look too cool - the really bad news happens when photographing people - they tend to come out looking less than healthy in your D70 pictures. Again, practice and getting to know your camera is the key. You’ll find that for some pictures, auto WB at zero actually produces the (artistically) better picture.

Here’s a pic taken with Automatic WB at 0:

And one with Auto WB at -2:

Notice how the second picture looks “warmer”? Look at the skin, and the subjects in the background. Whenever you hear people commenting about dull or gray-looking D70 pictures, Auto WB 0 (and EC 0 - more on that later) is normally the culprit.

Auto White Balance can sometimes go all over the place though, depending on the lighting and the positioning of the subjects, so I sometimes just select one of the presets. If I’m using the SB-800 flash, I’d use Flash 0 or Flash +3 for the white balance. Why Flash +3? Well, Flash 0 sometimes result in pictures that are too warm, so your photographic subjects come out with an orange or pinkish tint. So Flash +3 “cools” things down a bit in the color temperature department. Incidentally, I used Flash +3 in the two shots of Renice - I like it, but some of you might even think that it’s a bit too “warm”. To each their own, really.

… more to come.

A list of galleries showcasing great wedding photography style.

I like the wedding gallery linked to in this forum thread a lot!