<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David Chin Online &#187; Olympus 6000 Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidchinphoto.com/tag/olympus-6000-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidchinphoto.com</link>
	<description>Photography and other interesting stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 01:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Which Waterproof Digital Camera To Buy in 2009?</title>
		<link>http://www.davidchinphoto.com/which-waterproof-digital-camera-to-buy-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidchinphoto.com/which-waterproof-digital-camera-to-buy-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 05:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Chin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Categorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon D10 Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuji Z33WP Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus 550WP Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus 6000 Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus 8000 Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic TS1 / FT1 Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax W60 Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidchinphoto.com/?p=1129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Imaging Resource looks at seven contenders (the Canon Powershot D10, Olympus Tough-8000, Olympus Tough-6000, Olympus 550WP, Fuji Z33WP, Pentax W60, Panasonic TS1 / FT1) and has the conclusion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Imaging Resource looks at seven contenders (the Canon Powershot D10, Olympus Tough-8000, Olympus Tough-6000, Olympus 550WP, Fuji Z33WP, Pentax W60, Panasonic TS1 / FT1) and <a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/FIS/FITSA9.HTM">has the conclusion</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidchinphoto.com/which-waterproof-digital-camera-to-buy-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus Stylus Tough-6000 Express Review at The Imaging Resource</title>
		<link>http://www.davidchinphoto.com/olympus-stylus-tough-6000-express-review-at-the-imaging-resource/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidchinphoto.com/olympus-stylus-tough-6000-express-review-at-the-imaging-resource/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Chin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Categorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus 6000 Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus 6000 Samples]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidchinphoto.com/?p=1108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olympus Stylus Tough-6000 Express Review at The Imaging Resource &#8211; The Verdict:
We were pleasantly surprised to find that shots from the Olympus Stylus TOUGH-6000 could make good-looking prints as large as 13 x 19 inches at its lowest ISO setting. At that size, the prints were just slightly soft-looking, but more than adequate for display [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/OST6000/OST6000A.HTM">Olympus Stylus Tough-6000 Express Review at The Imaging Resource</a></b> &#8211; The Verdict:</p>
<blockquote><p>We were pleasantly surprised to find that shots from the Olympus Stylus TOUGH-6000 could make good-looking prints as large as 13 x 19 inches at its lowest ISO setting. At that size, the prints were just slightly soft-looking, but more than adequate for display on a wall at any kind of normal viewing distance.</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget to visit their <a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/OST6000/OST6000A7.HTM">gallery of full-resolution test photos and real-world image samples</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidchinphoto.com/olympus-stylus-tough-6000-express-review-at-the-imaging-resource/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Olympus 6000 fared in DPReview&#8217;s &#8216;Waterproof&#8217; Camera Group Test (Q2 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.davidchinphoto.com/how-the-olympus-6000-fared-in-dpreviews-waterproof-camera-group-test-q2-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidchinphoto.com/how-the-olympus-6000-fared-in-dpreviews-waterproof-camera-group-test-q2-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Chin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Categorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus 6000 Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidchinphoto.com/?p=408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How the Olympus 6000 fared in DPReview&#8217;s &#8216;Waterproof&#8217; Camera Group Test (Q2 2009) &#8211; In this Digital Photography Review&#8217;s test, the Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 (mju Tough 6000) emerged &#8220;Middle of the road&#8221; in almost every test category.
Don Wan, the reviewer, wrote:
The Olympus Tough 6000 is slightly better the the Tough 8000 and Fuji Z33, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q209waterproofgroup/">How the Olympus 6000 fared in DPReview&#8217;s &#8216;Waterproof&#8217; Camera Group Test (Q2 2009)</a></b> &#8211; In this Digital Photography Review&#8217;s test, the Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 (mju Tough 6000) emerged <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q209waterproofgroup/page15.asp">&#8220;Middle of the road&#8221;</a> in almost every test category.</p>
<p>Don Wan, the reviewer, wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Olympus Tough 6000 is slightly better the the Tough 8000 and Fuji Z33, and manages to resolve better detail than its bigger brother despite the 8000 having more megapixels.</p></blockquote>
<p>The <a href="http://www.davidchinphoto.com/canon-d10-vs-pentax-w60/">Canon D10 and Pentax W60</a> were picked as first and second choice, respectively, in the test.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidchinphoto.com/how-the-olympus-6000-fared-in-dpreviews-waterproof-camera-group-test-q2-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
